Claims

VR teaching yields significantly higher clinical operation scores than traditional teaching in orthopedic education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? VR teaching demonstrated significantly higher clinical operation scores compared to traditional teaching methods (SMD=1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.81; P<.001). → Li Ting 2025

Evidence

Li Ting 2025

Li Ting, Yan Jingxin, Gao Xin, Liu Hangyu, Li Jin, Shang Yuanting, Tang Xiaoyu. (2025). Using Virtual Reality to Enhance Surgical Skills and Engagement in Orthopedic Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/70266

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis pooling 15 RCTs (n=700) of VR versus traditional teaching; random-effects model applied because of significant heterogeneity (I2=78%). The pooled estimate favors VR for technical proficiency in clinical procedures; GRADE certainty was very low.

"VR teaching demonstrated significantly higher clinical operation scores compared to traditional teaching methods (SMD=1.44, 95% Cl 1.07-1.81; P<.001; see Figure 4)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.