Claims

VR simulation of orthodontic treatment produced higher student engagement and learning satisfaction than PowerPoint analysis

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a randomized cross-over study, VR simulating orthodontic treatment showed higher student engagement and learning satisfaction compared to PowerPoint analysis. → Baxmann Martin 2024

Evidence

Baxmann Martin 2024

Baxmann Martin, Baráth Zoltán, Kárpáti Krisztina. (2024). Efficacy of typodont and simulation training in orthodontic education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06425-8

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Chen et al. (2023), a randomized cross-over study of 102 students using VR simulating orthodontic treatment, measuring learning motivation and learning experience; "VR showed higher student engagement and learning satisfaction compared to PowerPoint analysis".

"VR showed higher student engagement and learning satisfaction compared to PowerPoint analysis"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.