Students rated the VR-IWS highly usable, with a mean SUS score of 85.36¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The students' average System Usability Scale score for the immersive VR-IWS was 85.36 points (SD 9.91), above the threshold of 68 considered good usability. → Herrera 2024

Evidence¶

Herrera 2024¶

Herrera, G., Vera, L., Pérez-Fuster, P., López-Fernández, A., López, Á., Savaş-Taşkesen, Ü., & Newbutt, N. (2024). Multisite usability and safety trial of an immersive virtual reality implementation of a work organization system for autistic learners: implications for technology design. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10422-5

q2 · i? · design · r2

Usability assessment in the multisite trial used the 10-item SUS with the 21 student participants, adapted administration by teachers. The article reports an average score of 85.36 points (SD 9.91), noting a score over 68 is considered good usability.

"On the SUS Usability Scale, the student's average score was 85.36 points (SD 9.91 points). A score over 68 is considered a good usability result according to that scale (Sauro, 2011)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• All 21 autistic students independently completed all 164 VR-IWS tasks offered across three countries — related
• Experimental-group participants rated TibetCPR highly usable (SUS = 84.3, an Excellent rating), with the highest items on voluntary engagement and independent use — related
• The Bloom classification UI shows low perceived workload and high usability in a 50-participant user study — related
• After design adjustments, the LAD achieved good–excellent usability (SUS M = 4.13, equal to 78.25%) — related