Teachers rated VR's potential effect on ML2 students' learning outcomes at a mean of 6.80 on a 10-point scale, with a significant age-related difference¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The mean rating of VR tools' potential effect on students' learning outcomes was 6.80 on a 10-point scale, and ANOVA found a significant difference between age groups, with younger educators more likely to believe VR can enhance language learning achievements. → Jacqueline Żammit 2024

Evidence¶

Jacqueline Żammit 2024¶

Jacqueline Żammit. (2024). Could virtual reality be the next approach for international students learning Maltese? Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10375-9

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Minor quantitative phase: survey of the 25 focus-group participants rating potential effectiveness on a 10-point scale, analyzed with ANOVA in MS Excel. The article reports the mean of 6.80 and an ANOVA (F = 31.70812, P value 9.89047E-06, Table 3).

"The mean value of 6.80 suggests that most teachers who participated in this research were confident that the application of VR tools could significantly influence their students' learning outcomes."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• 76% of surveyed ML2 teachers believed VR tools are effective for learning, though only 56% believed so for language learning specifically — related
• Thematic analysis identified immersion as the dominant theme, with teachers reporting VR could remove physical barriers and provide authentic practice settings for ML2 — related