Claims

VR-based nurse-physician communication team training is non-inferior to live simulation for communication performance and improves interprofessional attitudes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In an RCT of medical and nursing students, there were no significant differences in communication performance between virtual and live simulation groups, and both groups showed significant increases in interprofessional attitudes. → Deng Jing 2025

Evidence

Deng Jing 2025

Deng Jing, Tan Yifei, Chen Jing, Guo Xiujing, Wang Ling, Xie Chuan. (2025). Virtual reality simulation to teach communication for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08450-7

q3 · i? · review · r2

A randomized controlled trial with 60 medical and 60 nursing students compared 3 hours of team training in a 3D virtual environment versus a simulated ward. The review reports "no significant differences in the communication performance between virtual and simulation groups" and significant attitude increases in both groups.

"There were no significant differences in the communication performance between virtual and simulation groups. Both groups showed significant increases in interprofessional attitudes, and no significant differences were reported between the groups over the 3 time points."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.