A majority (65.5%) of the experimental group gave positive remarks that VRS exposure helped their actual practice, most often citing learning proper sequence (94.7%)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 65.5% of the experimental group responded positively, and 94.7% of comments focused on observing proper sequence. → Abeer William 2016

Evidence¶

Abeer William 2016¶

Abeer William, Victoria L. Vidal, Pamela John. (2016). Traditional Instruction Versus Virtual Reality Simulation: A Comparative Study of Phlebotomy Training among Nursing Students in Kuwait. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095814

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Questionnaire responses of the 29 experimental-group students after their clinic exposure, summarized in Figure 1: comments also cited aseptic technique, easier performance, choosing the right vein, proper equipment selection, and increased confidence.

"Positive remarks were given by 65.5% from the experimental group. As can be gleaned from Figure 1 , most of the comments focused on how VRS taught th em to do the procedure observing proper sequence (94.7 %)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students rated mobile learning activities positively and 80% gave positive interview feedback — related
• Students in the experimental group reported that Kahoot quizzes helped, were fun, and left them feeling positive about exam preparation — related
• Students respond positively to e-mail exchanges, guest speaker interviews, and video projects aimed at cross-cultural awareness — related