Claims

After WBES-based supportive education, the number of mastery-learning students increased at every RBT cognitive process level in the experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the experimental group, completely learned students increased at each level, e.g. remembering rose from 5 to 15 and evaluation from 0 to 8. → Goksu 2016

Evidence

Goksu 2016

Goksu, I. and Gulcu, A. (2016). The Evaluation of the Cognitive Learning Process of the Renewed Bloom Taxonomy Using a Web Based Expert System. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1117642

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive pre/post analysis of mastery learning per RBT level for the experimental group, shown in figure 8: "In the remembering level, pre-te st results show 5 and post-test results show 15 students who completely learned"; evaluation rose from 0 to 8 and creation from 3 to 7.

"In the remembering level, pre-te st results show 5 and post-test results show 15 students who completely learned."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.