Claims

Experts argue most school RJ implementation is weak and funding should first strengthen implementation before funding research

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Experts held that because most RJ implementation is weak, funding should focus on stronger implementation before research. → Hurley 2015

Evidence

Hurley 2015

Hurley, N., Guckenburg, S., Persson, H., Fronius, T., & Petrosino, A. (2015). What Further Research is Needed on Restorative Justice in Schools? WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559727

q1 · i? · qualitative · r1

Expert-opinion finding from the interview and focus-group study; the article reports this as one of three chief reservations experts expressed about RJ research, quoting their view that "funding should first be focused on stronger implementation and then on research."

"Because m ost implementation of RJ is “weak ,” funding should first be focused on stronger implementation and then on research."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id weak-implementation-before-research-funding
title Experts argue most school RJ implementation is weak and funding should first strengthen implementation before funding research
description Experts argue most school RJ implementation is weak and funding should first strengthen implementation before funding research
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hurley-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.