Claims

Elementary EFL learners taught through web-based instruction significantly outperform traditionally taught learners in writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After six months, the web-based group significantly outperformed the traditional group on the writing post-test (M 31.10 vs 16.95). → Maryam Soleimani & Shima Gahhari 2012

Evidence

Maryam Soleimani & Shima Gahhari 2012

Maryam Soleimani & Shima Gahhari. (2012). Computer Assisted Language Testing: On the Efficacy of Web-based Approach in the Instruction of Elementary Learners of English. English Language Teaching, 5(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p66

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test comparing gained writing scores of the 20-learner web-based group and 20-learner traditional group after six months of instruction. The web-based group "outperform(ed)" the traditional group, t(38)=7.64.

"Successively in table 3 the results indicate that students in web-based group outperform(M web-based =31.10, M traditional =16.95) learners in traditional ones ( t(38)=7.64; p.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.