Claims

Elementary EFL learners taught through web-based instruction significantly outperform traditionally taught learners in reading comprehension

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After six months, the web-based group scored significantly higher than the traditional group on the reading post-test (M 28.20 vs 17.90). → Maryam Soleimani & Shima Gahhari 2012

Evidence

Maryam Soleimani & Shima Gahhari 2012

Maryam Soleimani & Shima Gahhari. (2012). Computer Assisted Language Testing: On the Efficacy of Web-based Approach in the Instruction of Elementary Learners of English. English Language Teaching, 5(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p66

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 20 web-based and 20 traditional-group elementary learners in a language institute, compared on gained scores after six months. The t-test on reading showed "a significant difference" favoring the web-based group, t(38)=4.39.

"The result of the t-test indicates that there is a significant difference (M web-based =28.20, M traditional =17.90) between students in web-based group and in traditional group (t(df=38)=4.39; p.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.