Weekly ENA mean comparisons showed significant high–low performer differences in Weeks 2, 3, 6, and 7 on mr1 and in Weeks 5, 6, and 10 on svd2¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i3 Two-sample t-tests over 12 weeks found significant group differences on the x-axis (mr1) in Week 2 (d = 0.972), Week 3 (d = 0.747), Week 6 (d = 0.583), and Week 7 (d = 0.936). → Raković 2023 q2 i3 Significant differences on the y-axis (svd2) were detected in Week 5 (d = 0.730), Week 6 (d = 0.295), and Week 10 (d = 1.221). → Raković 2023

Evidence¶

Raković 2023¶

Raković, M., Ahmad Uzir, N., Matcha, W., Eagan, B., Jovanović, J., Shaffer, D. W., Pardo, A., & Gašević, D. (2023). Network Analytics to Unveil Links of Learning Strategies, Time Management, and Academic Performance in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(3), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7843

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

Series of two-sample t-tests in a mean-rotated ENA space (Figure 14; Table 5) comparing high performers (Nabove90th = 15) and low performers (Nbelow25th = 31) on both exams across 12 active weeks. The article also reports significant svd2 differences in Weeks 5, 6, and 10, with Cohen's d up to 1.221.

"We found a statistically significant difference between the two groups of students in Week 2 (t = 0.486, p = 0.028, Cohen's d = 0.972), Week 3 (t = 0.373, p = 0.039, Cohen's d = 0.747), Week 6 (t = 0.291, p = 0.010, Cohen's d = 0.583), and Week 7 (t = 0.468, p = 0.006, Cohen's d = 0.936)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High- and low-performing students did not differ significantly on the midterm-exam ENA network dimensions despite detected network differences — related
• High- and low-performing students differed significantly on the final-exam ENA network X dimension but not the Y dimension — related
• Low performers completed activities on time for fewer topics and showed less catching-up only in early topics, while high performers showed no catching-up on later topics — related
• ENA reveals different utterance co-occurrence structures by age: older adults show a stronger active–interactive connection while younger adults' constructive–interactive connection is not statistically confirmed — related
• ENA contrasting-cases analysis shows high- and low-effectiveness studies differ significantly in their design-element and intention networks — related