Women scored about 33 SAT-M points lower than men who took the same math course and received the same grade¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 1992 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Among almost 47,000 men and women matched on type of math course taken and grade received, women on average scored about 33 SAT points lower than men with the same course and grade. → Howard Wainer 1992
Evidence¶
Howard Wainer 1992¶
Howard Wainer, Linda Steinberg. (1992). Sex Differences in Performance on the Mathematics Section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Bidirectional Validity Study. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.3.1p1555011301r133
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Retrospective matched-sample analysis of first-year college math students, matching men and women on "type of math course taken and grade received". Women averaged "about 33 SAT points lower" than equally performing men; no standardized effect size is printed.
"Matching almost 47,000 men and women on type of math course taken and grade received, the authors found that, on average, women had scored about 33 SAT points lower than men who had taken the same course and received the same grade."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Systematic racial, ethnic and gender differences in grades persist among students with the same test scores, attendance, courses and teachers — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Prospective regression analysis of the same data found somewhat larger sex differences in the same direction — related
- The score gaps constitute evidence of sex differences in the validity of the SAT-M as a predictor of college math performance, though not of their cause — related
- Girls score lower than boys on timed standardized math and science tests at the same course level, and SAT math scores underpredict women's college math performance — a broader claim this one bears on
- SAT scores underpredict the academic performance of high school girls, who average lower scores than boys despite higher grades — related
- Women admitted to MIT with lower SAT math scores perform as well as men in freshman math classes — related
- Boys received more process praise and scored higher in 4th grade math than girls in this sample — related
- Gender differences in global performance judgments follow domain stereotypes: men higher in mathematics, women higher in reading, with no gender differences in bias — related
- Women score lower than men in high-stakes final exams across advanced undergraduate STEM courses, with mean differences of 2.5 to ~7 points on a 100-point scale — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
women-33-sat-points-lower-matched-course-grade |
title |
Women scored about 33 SAT-M points lower than men who took the same math course and received the same grade |
description |
Women scored about 33 SAT-M points lower than men who took the same math course and received the same grade |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1992 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — howard-wainer-1992 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.