Use evaluation to drive a cycle of improvement on incentive design and implementation¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The article's third key question asks "How can evaluation promote a cycle of improvement on the incentive design and implementation?" It recommends that schools treat evaluation as an ongoing tool that feeds findings back into revising attendance incentives, rather than evaluating only once after implementation.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Schools must conduct evaluations of their incentive programs and feed results back into design decisions
Constraints¶
- Applied in contexts where schools are implementing incentive-based attendance interventions under accountability pressure
Target Learners¶
- students from pre-K to grade 12
Target Learning Goals¶
- improving student attendance
Affordances¶
Related Strategies¶
- Use student experience data in an iterative inquire-change-monitor cycle with students as partners
- Establish site-based professional learning structured around the three inquiry questions
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- NO AUTHOR LINE. (2018). Incentive-Based Approaches to Improving Attendance. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR). https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cjep20
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
evaluation-cycle-improves-incentive-implementation |
title |
Use evaluation to drive a cycle of improvement on incentive design and implementation |
description |
The article's third key question asks "How can evaluation promote a cycle of improvement on the incentive design and implementation?" It recommends that schools treat evaluation as an ongoing tool that feeds findings... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — no-author-line-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.