Strategies

Five-step iterative co-design process for developing edtech evaluation criteria with learners and vendors

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The report details a repeatable recipe for co-designing evaluation criteria: "Digital Promise and the CO used a multi-staged, iterative co-design methodology to center student, faculty, and staff voices throughout the development of each badge requirement". Each badge followed five identical steps: define needs through design sessions, refine priorities through survey dissemination, interview edtech vendors for feedback, invite vendors to pilot the application, and assess pilot submissions to finalize the application. Over 400 students, faculty, and staff completed the three prioritization surveys, analyzed via thematic and frequency-distribution analysis triangulated with demographic data.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id five-step-codesign-badge-development-process
title Five-step iterative co-design process for developing edtech evaluation criteria with learners and vendors
description The report details a repeatable recipe for co-designing evaluation criteria: "Digital Promise and the CO used a multi-staged, iterative co-design methodology to center student, faculty, and staff voices throughout the...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-nostrand-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.