Implement Math 180 as a blended rotation model with 1:1 computer use during rotation and roughly half the class on software at a time¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

Both efficacy studies used a blended model of implementation in which approximately half the class worked independently on the adaptive software at any given time while the teacher facilitated instruction with the other students. Classrooms were equipped with smart boards, students worked on dedicated computer terminals with a 1:1 ratio during a rotation, and "a 2:1 student to computer ratio in the classroom was adequate." Other models such as Flex do not require a dedicated classroom.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• A dedicated classroom with a teacher or paraprofessional for each section under the blended model used in the studies.
• Dedicated computer terminals supporting a 2:1 student-to-computer ratio, since approximately half the class works on software at a given time.

Constraints¶

• The dedicated-classroom requirement applies to the blended model studied; other implementation models such as Flex do not require a dedicated classroom.

Target Learners¶

• middle-grades mathematics intervention students

Target Learning Goals¶

• mathematics achievement growth toward grade-level proficiency

Related Strategies¶

• Support Math 180 teachers with initial start-up training plus 2-3 coaching visits during the year
• Individual Rotation
• Lab Rotation
• Station Rotation
• Blended Cognitive Tutor® implementation alternating collaborative textbook periods with adaptive software lab periods

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Math 180® Evidence Rating Summary. (2017). https://www.hmhco.com/math-180