Select self-management configurations based on review evidence for specific intervention approaches¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 1 study (1 quant-synthesis),q3· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The review's stated purpose includes understanding "the effectiveness of specific, commonly utilized intervention approaches", and the authors state that "Implications for selecting self-management configurations, as well as conducting future research, are discussed." Practitioners should therefore choose among configurations such as prompted self-monitoring, self-monitoring plus reinforcement, or prompted self-monitoring plus graphing using the configuration-specific evidence the review assembles.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Practitioners need access to configuration-specific effect size evidence, since mean effects vary in heterogeneity across configurations.
Constraints¶
- Selection guidance is grounded in single-case design studies with school-aged students; heterogeneity limits generalization across grade levels, disability status, and settings.
Target Learners¶
- School-aged students, including those with disabilities and those in general or special education settings
Target Learning Goals¶
- Improved student classroom behavior (e.g., on-task behavior, reduced disruptive behavior)
Affordances¶
Claims¶
- Prompted self-monitoring is the most frequently used self-management configuration in school-based single-case research [+W]
- Substantial variability exists in the specific components used across self-management interventions despite established effectiveness [+W]
- Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting [+W]
- Self-management intervention configurations show strong mean effect sizes but substantial effect size heterogeneity in single-case research [+W]
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Briesch, A.M., Daniels, B. & Beneville, M. (2019). Unpacking the Term “Self-Management”: Understanding Intervention Applications Within the School-Based Literature. J Behav Educ 28, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
select-self-management-configurations-from-review-evidence |
title |
Select self-management configurations based on review evidence for specific intervention approaches |
description |
The review's stated purpose includes understanding "the effectiveness of specific, commonly utilized intervention approaches", and the authors state that "Implications for selecting self-management configurations, as... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — briesch-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.