Theories

Accountable talk: three accountabilities — to knowledge, reasoning, and community

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 3 studies (3 review), q1 · 0 of 3 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The primer describes accountable talk (attributed to Resnick et al., 2018) as a concept emphasizing that productive dialogue holds students accountable to knowledge, reasoning, and community. Students "ground their claims in evidence and justify their reasoning based on available information," contributions go beyond simple agreement or disagreement to explore alternatives, and all students are positioned as valuable contributors so that ideas, not individuals, are challenged.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Accountable talk: three accountabilities — to knowledge, reasoning, and community
description The primer describes accountable talk (attributed to Resnick et al., 2018) as a concept emphasizing that productive dialogue holds students accountable to knowledge, reasoning, and community.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — schank-p-jenks-l-barth

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.