Theories

Four-category framework for evaluating language-learning apps: technology, pedagogy, user experience, and language learning

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 design), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The article presents an evaluation framework grounded in prior app-evaluation frameworks and SLA task-design principles, offered as reflection questions rather than a scored rubric. As stated, "The new framework proposed here is divided into four primary categories: technology, user experience, pedagogy, and subject specific (in this case language learning), each with a number of criteria." Criteria overlap across categories (e.g. feedback appears in all four), and the questions are intended as a reflection tool for learners, teachers, developers, and researchers rather than a marking scheme.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Four-category framework for evaluating language-learning apps: technology, pedagogy, user experience, and language learning
description The article presents an evaluation framework grounded in prior app-evaluation frameworks and SLA task-design principles, offered as reflection questions rather than a scored rubric.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rosell-aguilar-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.