Theories

Interaction Equivalency Theorem: deep formal learning is supported when one of three interaction forms is at a high level

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

The Interaction Equivalency Theorem, posited by Anderson (2003a), holds that deep and meaningful formal learning is supported as long as one of the three forms of interaction — student-teacher, student-student, or student-content — is at a high level, while the other two may be minimal or eliminated. Thesis 2 states that high levels of more than one mode will likely provide a more satisfying educational experience, though possibly less cost- or time-effective. The article re-conceptualizes the Theorem as two core theses of quality (Thesis 1) and quantity (Thesis 2) and tests it empirically in blended learning contexts.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Interaction Equivalency Theorem: deep formal learning is supported when one of three interaction forms is at a high level
description The Interaction Equivalency Theorem, posited by Anderson (2003a), holds that deep and meaningful formal learning is supported as long as one of the three forms of interaction — student-teacher, student-student, or stu...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — miyazoe-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.