Theories

Social justice impact spectrum for OEP: transformative, ameliorative, neutral or negative

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 2 studies (1 design, 1 theoretical), q1–q2 · 0 of 2 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The article extends Hodgkinson-Williams and Trotter's framework, built on Fraser's model of social justice, to expansive process-centric OEP. It defines four levels of impact: "Transformative refers to addressing systemic/structural roots of injustice, affirmative/ameliorative refers to addressing surface injustice, neutral refers to not having a social justice impact, and negative means reproducing or even exacerbating injustice". Table 2 maps each OEP onto this spectrum across contexts.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Social justice impact spectrum for OEP: transformative, ameliorative, neutral or negative
description The article extends Hodgkinson-Williams and Trotter's framework, built on Fraser's model of social justice, to expansive process-centric OEP.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bali-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.