Reflective Judgment Framework: a three-level developmental model of reasoning about ill-defined problems¶
Theory · All theories
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The Reflective Judgment Framework (RJF), developed by King and Kitchener, is "a developmental model describing the changing patterns of reasoning over a person's life-span," assessed by analyzing interviews about ill-defined problems with evidence for multiple solutions. It distinguishes Pre-Reflective, Quasi-Reflective, and Reflective levels, each characterized by distinct views of knowledge and justification: authority-based, opinion-based, and contextual evaluation of evidence. The article uses the framework to analyze how students in the restructured astronomy course experienced and practiced reflective judgment.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Reasoning level is evaluated by analyzing recorded interviews in which individuals think about ill-defined problems for which evidence supports two or more different solutions or options.
Constraints¶
- The article notes that speaking of individuals as 'in' a certain stage is an oversimplification; thinking levels are domain specific, and optimal versus functional levels of reflective judgment must be distinguished.
Target Learners¶
- college students
- undergraduate non-science majors
Target Learning Objectives¶
- reflective judgment
- critical thinking about problems in science
- epistemological development
Claims¶
- Restructured Astronomy Wide Reflective Judgment Variation [+M]
Related Theories¶
- Fischer and Knight's skill theory of cognitive development in real children
- Reflective Judgment Model (RJM)
- King and Kitchener's Reflective Judgment Model: a seven-stage developmental framework of epistemic assumptions and justification
Examples¶
- Lecture-free, problem-centered, collaborative course pattern built on model construction and evaluation
- Six recommendations for fostering reflective judgment in introductory college science
Key Sources¶
- Carr, K. M. (1997). A Constructivist Approach To Reflective Judgment and Science Literacy in Introductory College Science Instruction. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED414179
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
theory |
title |
Reflective Judgment Framework: a three-level developmental model of reasoning about ill-defined problems |
description |
The Reflective Judgment Framework (RJF), developed by King and Kitchener, is "a developmental model describing the changing patterns of reasoning over a person's life-span," assessed by analyzing interviews about ill-... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — carr-1997 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.