Theories

Reflective Judgment Framework: a three-level developmental model of reasoning about ill-defined problems

Theory · All theories
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The Reflective Judgment Framework (RJF), developed by King and Kitchener, is "a developmental model describing the changing patterns of reasoning over a person's life-span," assessed by analyzing interviews about ill-defined problems with evidence for multiple solutions. It distinguishes Pre-Reflective, Quasi-Reflective, and Reflective levels, each characterized by distinct views of knowledge and justification: authority-based, opinion-based, and contextual evaluation of evidence. The article uses the framework to analyze how students in the restructured astronomy course experienced and practiced reflective judgment.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Reflective Judgment Framework: a three-level developmental model of reasoning about ill-defined problems
description The Reflective Judgment Framework (RJF), developed by King and Kitchener, is "a developmental model describing the changing patterns of reasoning over a person's life-span," assessed by analyzing interviews about ill-...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — carr-1997

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.