Theories

Reflective Judgment Model (RJM)

Theory · All theories
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The Reflective Judgment Model, developed by King and Kitchener (1994), is a model of adult cognitive development related to epistemological beliefs. The article describes it as "a continuum of qualitatively different stages, each associated with specific epistemological assumptions and standpoints, through which individuals progress (though not necessarily in a linear fashion) as they learn to face complex, ill-structured problems." It spans seven levels, from Pre-Reflective thinking that treats knowledge as absolutely certain, through Quasi-Reflective thinking that accepts uncertainty and evidence, toward evaluated, integrative reasoning. The study used the RJM as the framework for analyzing how preservice teachers approached ill-defined dilemmas of practice.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Reflective Judgment Model (RJM)
description The Reflective Judgment Model, developed by King and Kitchener (1994), is a model of adult cognitive development related to epistemological beliefs.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — schoen-2005

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.