SDT motivational spectrum from amotivation through four extrinsic regulations to intrinsic motivation¶
Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 5 studies (3 theoretical, 1 quant-synthesis, 1 review),q1–q4· 1 of 5 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article describes SDT's motivational spectrum as a fine-grained alternative to viewing motivation as all-or-nothing: "a spectrum of motivation from amotivation (literally, without motivation) through externally motivated behaviors, to intrinsic motivation." Four types of extrinsic motivation are distinguished: external regulation (rewards, money, or the task outcome), introjected regulation (fears of guilt, shame, or having to do the task), identified regulation (taking on a task because one knows it is valuable), and integrated regulation (engaging because the activity represents who one is). Intrinsic motivation, at the most positive end, originates when a person volitionally undertakes a task because she finds it inherently satisfying and enjoyable.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Distinguishing the quality of motivation, not merely its quantity, when analyzing learner behavior
Constraints¶
- The article notes only a very few people are without motivation; most are motivated in positive or negative ways
Target Learners¶
- K-12 and higher education students
Target Learning Objectives¶
- Understanding the internalization of motivation for academic tasks
Claims¶
- Autonomy-supportive teaching contrasts with controlling teaching, and controlled students do poorly compared to autonomous students [+W]
- Self-determination theory holds that autonomy support raises intrinsic motivation, and a meta-analysis finds expected tangible rewards undermine it [+M]
- The article argues extrinsic rewards such as grades can reduce intrinsic motivation and should be phased out [+W]
Related Theories¶
- Self-Determination Theory
- Self-determination theory: a motivation and personality theory built on three basic psychological needs
- Expectancy-Value Theory
- ARCS Model of Motivational Design
- Self-Determination Theory as a framework for L2/ESP motivation
- SDT motivation continuum: four forms of extrinsic motivation varying in autonomy
- Self-determination theory framework of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations for L2 learning
- Internalization-based mapping between SDT motivation types and L2MSS self constructs
- Social-psychological construct framework for Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety
Examples¶
Key Sources¶
- Jennifer D. Moss. (2017). Inviting Autonomy: Common Roots and Beliefs of Self-determination Theory and Invitational Education Theory. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice. https://www.invitationaleducation.net/journal-of-invitational-theory-and-practice/
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
theory |
title |
SDT motivational spectrum from amotivation through four extrinsic regulations to intrinsic motivation |
description |
The article describes SDT's motivational spectrum as a fine-grained alternative to viewing motivation as all-or-nothing: "a spectrum of motivation from amotivation (literally, without motivation) through externally mo... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jennifer-d-moss-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.