Theories

Six-category question taxonomy for measuring curiosity in STEM contexts

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 1 study (1 design), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The article devises a categorization scheme for student questions as a simple measurement tool for curiosity, since existing curiosity theories do not categorize question types. "Based on this theoretical framework, the question categories us ed in this study to assess curiosity are as follows." The six categories are INCONGRUOUS (violating a model or heuristic rule), CONGRUOUS (understanding or gathering information about how a model or rule is applied), MODIFYING (probing changed assumptions or parameters), GENERALIZING/ANALOGY (comparing models), CAUSAL/CREATIVE (generating or improving models), and INFORMATIONAL (intrinsic-interest information).

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Six-category question taxonomy for measuring curiosity in STEM contexts
description The article devises a categorization scheme for student questions as a simple measurement tool for curiosity, since existing curiosity theories do not categorize question types.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fv-kowalski-and-se-kowalski-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.