The 5E intervention produced no significant differences on any of the three attitude-scale subfactors¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Posttest comparisons showed no significant group differences for affection (p = 0.738), interest (p = 0.558), or importance of physics in daily life (p = 0.214). → Guzel 2016
Evidence¶
Guzel 2016¶
Hatice Guzel. (2016). The effect of brightness of lamps teaching based on the 5E model on students' academic achievement and attitudes. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2915
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Independent t-tests on the 30-item Science Attitude Scale's three subfactors, each compared pre and post between the experimental (n=29) and control (n=33) groups; all posttest comparisons were non-significant. No effect sizes are printed.
"As seen in Table 6, there is no s ignificant difference between groups (p =0.738 >0.05). This result shows that there are no changes in the attitudes of the students in terms of “affection” subfactor."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- ANCOVA controlling for pre-test scores showed a significant post-test attitude difference favoring the project-based group — related
- The 5E and traditional groups were statistically equivalent in achievement and interest before treatment — related
- The 5E instructional model produced significantly higher posttest interest in mathematics than traditional instruction — reports the opposite
- 5E inquiry learning activities did not change cognitive attitude toward chemistry relative to lecture-based teaching — related
- Neither the VR application nor the traditional lesson produced a significant positive change in pro-environmental attitudes — related
- Fifth-grade students taught science through inquiry-based instruction supported by the 5E learning cycle achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught by traditional methods — related
- Learners invest more effort in tasks they perceive as interesting, personally important, or useful to their future goals. — related
- 5E-model teaching of lamp brightness produced higher posttest achievement than traditional teaching in a quasi-experiment with 62 11th-grade students — related
- The animation-assisted 5E application produced a significant pre-to-post attitude change in the experimental group while the control group's attitudes did not change — related
- Learning cycle approach-based teaching did not significantly change attitudes towards science course compared with teacher-centered teaching — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.