Claims

The 5E intervention produced no significant differences on any of the three attitude-scale subfactors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Posttest comparisons showed no significant group differences for affection (p = 0.738), interest (p = 0.558), or importance of physics in daily life (p = 0.214). → Guzel 2016

Evidence

Guzel 2016

Hatice Guzel. (2016). The effect of brightness of lamps teaching based on the 5E model on students' academic achievement and attitudes. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2915

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent t-tests on the 30-item Science Attitude Scale's three subfactors, each compared pre and post between the experimental (n=29) and control (n=33) groups; all posttest comparisons were non-significant. No effect sizes are printed.

"As seen in Table 6, there is no s ignificant difference between groups (p =0.738 >0.05). This result shows that there are no changes in the attitudes of the students in terms of “affection” subfactor."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.