Claims

The animation-assisted 5E application produced a significant pre-to-post attitude change in the experimental group while the control group's attitudes did not change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A significant difference was found between pre- and post-practice attitude scores in the experimental group using the animation-assisted 5E application, whereas no significant difference was seen in the control group. → Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Evidence

Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Mehmet Fatih Özcan, Latife Kirbaşoğlu Kiliç. (2017). The Effects of Animation Supported 5E Model on Teaching 'Indicative and Subjunctive Moods' in 7th Grade Turkish Lesson. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051407

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre/post attitude scale comparison within each group in the quasi-experiment, using the Ministry of National Education (EARGED) Turkish Lesson Attitude Scale. The article reports a significant pre-post difference only in the experimental group; no statistic or effect size is printed.

"It was seen that there was no significant difference in the pre- and post-practice attitude scores of the control group in which the current teaching program was applied. 3. A significant difference was found in the pre - and post-practice attitude scores of the experimental group in which the animation- assisted 5E application was used"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.