Claims

Academics most often name Gmail and Google Drive as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise safety needs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Gmail and Google Drive were the most common tools for meeting safety needs, with map and navigation applications also used, supporting the safety step of the Digital Needs Pyramid. → YILDIZ 2021

Evidence

YILDIZ 2021

YILDIZ, Ezgi Pelin. (2021). Academist Perceptions on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools Through Maslow's Needs Hierarchy: A Case Study. Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol.4, No.1, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.185

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of Table 8 tool frequencies from the 20-academician case study; Google Drive and Gmail each at 21.7%, and the article states the results "support the Web 2.0 tools used in the safety needs a step of Maslow's Digital Needs Pyramid."

"it is seen that the most common tools used by academics to meet their safety needs are Gmail and Google Drive."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id academics-prefer-gmail-google-drive-safety
title Academics most often name Gmail and Google Drive as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise safety needs
description Academics most often name Gmail and Google Drive as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise safety needs
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yildiz-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.