Claims

Academics most often name Instagram and LinkedIn as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise esteem needs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the case study, Instagram and LinkedIn were the most frequently named Web 2.0 tools for realising esteem needs, with 16 academics naming LinkedIn. → YILDIZ 2021

Evidence

YILDIZ 2021

YILDIZ, Ezgi Pelin. (2021). Academist Perceptions on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools Through Maslow's Needs Hierarchy: A Case Study. Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol.4, No.1, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.185

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of Table 4 tool frequencies from the 20-academician case study; Instagram (21.8%) and LinkedIn (18.3%) led, and the article states "16 academics use LinkedIn tool for this need."

"it is determined that the Web 2.0 tools used by academics to realise the need for esteem are mostly Instagram and LinkedIn. Twitter and Snapchat followed these tools."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id academics-prefer-instagram-linkedin-esteem
title Academics most often name Instagram and LinkedIn as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise esteem needs
description Academics most often name Instagram and LinkedIn as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise esteem needs
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yildiz-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.