Academics most often name Facebook as the Web 2.0 tool they use to realise belonging and love needs¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Facebook was the most used tool for meeting belonging and love needs, followed by Instagram and WhatsApp, and video/audio call tools were also frequently preferred. → YILDIZ 2021

Evidence¶

YILDIZ 2021¶

YILDIZ, Ezgi Pelin. (2021). Academist Perceptions on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools Through Maslow's Needs Hierarchy: A Case Study. Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol.4, No.1, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.185

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of Table 6 tool frequencies from the 20-academician case study; the article adds that tools such as Skype, Google Hangout, Google Talk, Facetime and Clips were frequently preferred for these needs.

"it is seen that the most used tool by academics to meet their belonging and love needs is Facebook, followed by Instagram and WhatsApp."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Academics most often name Instagram and LinkedIn as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise esteem needs — related
• Academics most often name YouTube and Instagram as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise self-actualisation needs — related
• Academics most often name Gmail and Google Drive as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise safety needs — related
• Academics most often name smartphones and personal computers as the tools they use to realise physiological needs — related
• Academics hold both positive and negative views of Web 2.0 tools for self-actualisation, with creativity skills the most frequent positive and time loss the most frequent negative — related