Claims

ACCESS produces a moderate improvement in self-reported daily functioning relative to delayed treatment among college students with ADHD

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 The rate of change in AIM-A Performance/Daily Functioning was significantly higher in the ACCESS group (d = .72), with the delayed condition showing no change. → Eddy et al. 2021

Evidence

Eddy et al. 2021

Laura D. Eddy, Arthur D. Anastopoulos, Melissa R. Dvorsky, Paul J. Silvia, Jeffrey D. Labban & Joshua M. Langberg (2021). An RCT of a CBT Intervention for Emerging Adults with ADHD Attending College: Functional Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1867989

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Latent growth curve analysis of the AIM-A Performance/Daily Functioning scale in the RCT showed a moderate-to-large between-condition effect ("d = .72 [.46, .97]") favoring immediate ACCESS.

"the immediate ACCESS (b = 18.01, SE = 2.01, p < .001) condition significantly increased in overall functioning over time, but the DTC (b = 2.30, SE = 1.92, p = .230) condition did not change. The rate of change was significantly higher in the ACCESS group, Wald (1) = 36.43, p < .001, d = .72 [.46, .97]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.