Claims

ACCESS produces significantly greater improvement in self-reported time management than delayed treatment among college students with ADHD

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 The rate of change in time management was significantly higher in the immediate ACCESS group than the delayed treatment condition (d = .48). → Eddy et al. 2021

Evidence

Eddy et al. 2021

Laura D. Eddy, Arthur D. Anastopoulos, Melissa R. Dvorsky, Paul J. Silvia, Jeffrey D. Labban & Joshua M. Langberg (2021). An RCT of a CBT Intervention for Emerging Adults with ADHD Attending College: Functional Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1867989

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Multi-site RCT of 250 college students with ADHD randomized to immediate ACCESS or delayed treatment; multi-group latent growth curve models on the LASSI-2 Time Management scale showed a medium between-condition effect ("d = .48 [.23, .73]").

"The immediate ACCESS (b = 4.23, SE = .56, p < .001) and the DTC (b = 1.52, SE = .45, p = .001) conditions both increased in time management significantly over time, but the rate of change was significantly higher in the ACCESS group, Wald (1) = 14.16, p < .001, d = .48 [.23, .73]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.