Claims

The academic benefit of active classrooms is larger in preschool children than in primary or middle school children

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Preschool subgroups show a large pooled effect (SMD = 1.05) versus a smaller primary-school effect (SMD = 0.21) and no effect in the single middle-school study (SMD = -0.01). → Bedard Chloe 2019

Evidence

Bedard Chloe 2019

Bedard Chloe, St John Laura, Bremer Emily, Graham Jeffrey D., Cairney John. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of physically active classrooms on educational and enjoyment outcomes in school age children. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218633

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup meta-analysis by grade. Six preschool studies (cluster-adjusted n = 122) pooled to SMD = 1.05; ten primary-school studies (n = 666) pooled to SMD = 0.21; the single middle-school study (n = 63) showed SMD = -0.01 with a CI including no effect. The X2 test of subgroup differences was statistically significant.

"the pooled estimate shows an increase in academic performance (SMD = 1.05) with CI excluding no effect following active classroom lessons compared to traditional classrooms. The pooled estimate from ten studies looking at children in primary school (cluster adjusted n = 666) shows a smaller increase in academic performance (SMD = 0.21)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.