Claims

Evidence for effective experiential learning approaches is weaker for preschool children than for primary school children

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Fewer studies were conducted with preschool-aged children, effects were smaller, and less evidence of effective experiential learning approaches was found for this age group. → Varman Sumantla D. 2021

Evidence

Varman Sumantla D. 2021

Varman Sumantla D., Cliff Dylan P., Jones Rachel A., Hammersley Megan L., Zhang Zhiguang, Charlton Karen, Kelly Bridget. (2021). Experiential Learning Interventions and Healthy Eating Outcomes in Children: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010824

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Review synthesis comparing evidence across age groups: six preschool studies versus 19 primary school studies. The discussion reports "fewer studies conducted in preschool-aged children compared to older children and the effects were smaller". One community-setting study reported a small effect.

"However, there were fewer studies conducted in preschool-aged children compared to older children and the effects were smaller, therefore less evidence of effective experiential learning approaches was found for this age group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.