Active learning instruction produced significantly higher overall final exam scores than traditional lecture instruction in a preparatory-year writing and research course¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students taught via active learning scored significantly higher on the overall final exam (mean 89.93) than students taught via traditional lecture (mean 77.04). → Alghamdi and Deraney 2018
Evidence¶
Alghamdi and Deraney 2018¶
Hamdan Alghamdi, A. K., & Deraney, P. (2018). Teaching Research Skills to Undergraduate Students Using an Active Learning Approach: A Proposed Model for Preparatory-Year Students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 184-194. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental comparison of two groups of female students (n=137 control, n=119 experimental) taught by one instructor, measured by the same 20-question multiple-choice final exam. Table 2 reports control mean 77.04 (SD 16.49), experimental mean 89.93 (SD 15.16), t value 6.47, level of significance 0.01. The article reports a "statistically significant difference" between the groups.
"The results show that there is a statistically significant difference between the average scores of students from the experimental group (taught using active learning) and students from the control group (taught using traditional techniques of education) when comparing final exam performance scores"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Active learning students outperformed traditional-instruction students on each of the 14 individual writing and research skills, with an average 10.5-point higher score — related
- Pre-service teachers taught with flipped learning scored significantly higher than lecture-taught peers on the first, second and final exams, but not on final grade — related
- PBL produces higher examination scores than LBL in undergraduate pharmacology education (SMD = 2.03) — related
- Flipped classroom combined with active-learning activities yields higher pooled exam scores than flipped classroom with minimal discussion in introductory A&P — related
- Students in flipped college algebra sections scored significantly higher on the final exam than students in lecture-based control sections (p = .0143) — related
- Students taught with a cooperative learning strategy scored significantly higher on laboratory reports than students taught with an individualistic strategy in a general chemistry laboratory course — related
- Flipped classroom instruction produced significantly higher calculus achievement than traditional instruction in a quasi-experiment at University of Tabuk — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.