Agencies built multi-source linked data systems and worked to increase analytic capacity through hiring, vendor partnerships, and training¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Agencies built data systems that included linked data from multiple sources. → Cassie Pickens Jewell 2014
q2 i? Agency staff acknowledged the importance of data use and technically skilled employees, and worked to increase analytic capacity by hiring technically skilled staff, developing partnerships with vendors, or providing training to support data use. → Cassie Pickens Jewell 2014
Evidence¶
Cassie Pickens Jewell 2014¶
Cassie Pickens Jewell, Libby Makowsky, Kristin Hallgren, Jacob Hartog. (2014). Changing Education Agencies from the Inside Out: Year 2 Report on the Strategic Data Project and Education Pioneers. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/changing-education-agencies-from-the-inside-out-year-2-report-on-the-strategic-data-project
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Key finding from the case studies of SDP- and EP-partnered agencies. Agencies built systems with "linked data from multiple sources" and pursued three routes to analytic capacity: hiring skilled staff, vendor partnerships, and training. Descriptive finding with no effect sizes.
"Agencies have built data systems to include linked data from multiple sources; agency staff acknowledge the importance of data use and of technically skilled employees to support it, and they are working to increase analytic capacity by hiring technically skilled staff, developing partnerships with vendors, or providing training to support data use."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Data-use capacity and activity differed between agencies with longer SDP or EP partnerships and agencies new to their partnerships — related
- The SDP and EP programs aim to enhance education agencies' data capacity through support, training, and placement of additional staff — related
- SDP and EP partnerships enabled education agencies to develop new data-use practices that agencies continue to refine — related
- Capacity for data use was similar among SDP- and EP-partnered agencies although the two programs' approaches differ — related
- The 2007 DC reforms aimed to improve student achievement by hiring and retaining higher quality teachers and providing families more public school choices — related
- Consolidating edtech tools enabled DPS to pursue vendor partnerships that systematically compare app usage with student data to evaluate tool effectiveness — related
- A partnership developed an approach for identifying at-risk students using school data linked with child welfare, justice, human services, and public benefits data. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Single-initiative data analysis has not always changed agency-wide policies and practices, and many staff may lack skills to interpret findings — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
agencies-built-linked-data-systems-and-analytic-capacity |
title |
Agencies built multi-source linked data systems and worked to increase analytic capacity through hiring, vendor partnerships, and training |
description |
Agencies built multi-source linked data systems and worked to increase analytic capacity through hiring, vendor partnerships, and training |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cassie-pickens-jewell-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.