AI-supported inquiry-based learning did not produce a statistically significant improvement in students' critical problem-solving skills¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The difference in critical problem-solving skills between the AI-supported inquiry group and the conventional group was not statistically significant; equivalence was not tested. → Mujib 2026
Evidence¶
Mujib 2026¶
Mujib, M., Suherman, S. and Mardiyah, M. (2026) 'Evaluating the Impact of AI-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Creative Mathematical Performance, Critical Problem-Solving Skills, and Attitudes toward Mathematics', Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 142–153. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2026.190204
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Null result from the same quasi-experimental comparison of AI-supported inquiry-based learning and conventional instruction, measured with validated tests. The article reports no statistically significant improvement in critical problem-solving skills and prints no effect size.
"but it did not produce a statistically significant improvement in critical problem-solving skills"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Problem Solving — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- AI-supported inquiry-based learning significantly improved secondary students' attitudes toward mathematics compared with traditional instruction — related
- AI-supported inquiry-based learning significantly improved secondary students' creative mathematical performance compared with traditional instruction — related
- The study's findings suggest AI-supported inquiry-based learning mainly supports creativity and affective development, with limited effect on problem-solving skills — related
- Intervention cohort scored significantly higher on creativity thinking, design skills, and problem solving, but not on presentation or attendance — related
- AI verification literacy does not directly predict critical thinking or technical problem-solving — related
- GPT feedback in VR markedly improved problem-solving and critical thinking but had limited impact on creativity — reports the opposite
- Inquiry-based learning strategies in laboratory courses are reported to significantly improve critical thinking skills — related
- Open inquiry enhances students' scientific and thinking skills, including metacognitive and creative thinking — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-ibi-no-significant-gain-critical-problem-solving |
title |
AI-supported inquiry-based learning did not produce a statistically significant improvement in students' critical problem-solving skills |
description |
AI-supported inquiry-based learning did not produce a statistically significant improvement in students' critical problem-solving skills |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mujib-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.