Claims

Airway management skills decay significantly after training in both simulation-based and non-simulation based groups, with between-group differences no longer evident at follow-up

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Three studies with repeated testing 4 weeks or 8 months later showed skills decayed significantly in both SBT and NSBT groups and between-group differences were no longer evident at follow-up. → Sun Yanxia 2017

Evidence

Sun Yanxia 2017

Sun Yanxia, Pan Chuxiong, Li Tianzuo, Gan Tong J. (2017). Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0313-7

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Skill-retention analysis of three studies evaluating BMV, DL and cricoid pressure with repeated testing 4 weeks or 8 months later. The review reports "the skills decay significantly in both SBT and NSBT groups" with no between-group difference at follow-up.

"All of these studies showed that the skills decay significantly in both SBT and NSBT groups and the between-group differences were no longer evident at follow-up assessment."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.