Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for time-skill in airway management¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Pooled random-effects analysis of four studies showed no significant difference between SBT and NSBT in time to complete task (SMD −0.13, 95% CI −0.82 to 0.57). → Sun Yanxia 2017
Evidence¶
Sun Yanxia 2017¶
Sun Yanxia, Pan Chuxiong, Li Tianzuo, Gan Tong J. (2017). Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0313-7
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-analysis of four comparative trials reporting time to complete task. The pooled random-effects "SMD was −0.13 (95% CI: −0.82 to 0.57)", showing no significant difference between SBT and NSBT groups; no standardized effect-size interpretation beyond the SMD is printed.
"However, pooled estimates of the remaining four studies [10, 17–19] showed no significant difference between SBT and NSBT groups. Pooled random-effects SMD was −0.13 (95% CI: −0.82 to 0.57)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Procedure-related complications do not differ significantly between simulation-based and non-simulation based training groups — related
- Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for knowledge acquisition in airway management — related
- Simulation-based training does not significantly improve success rate of procedure completion on patients compared with non-simulation based training — related
- Simulation-based training produces a small improvement in behavior performance compared with non-simulation based training for airway management — related
- Airway management skills decay significantly after training in both simulation-based and non-simulation based groups, with between-group differences no longer evident at follow-up — related
- Simulation-based training increases learner interest and satisfaction compared with non-simulation based training for airway management — related
- The behavior performance benefit of simulation-based training is only significant for flexible laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy training, not direct laryngoscopy — related
- AccuTouch VR simulator training improved live fibreoptic intubation performance in inexperienced paediatric residents, reducing time to intubation from 5.15 to 0.88 minutes — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.