Claims

Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for knowledge acquisition in airway management

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pooled random-effects analysis of five studies using written examination scores showed no significant difference between SBT and NSBT (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.86). → Sun Yanxia 2017

Evidence

Sun Yanxia 2017

Sun Yanxia, Pan Chuxiong, Li Tianzuo, Gan Tong J. (2017). Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0313-7

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of five comparative trials using written examination scores to evaluate knowledge acquisition. The pooled random-effects "SMD of 0.39 (95% CI:−0.09 to 0.86)" showed no significant difference between SBT and NSBT groups; the confidence interval crosses zero.

"The pooled random-effects SMD of 0.39 (95% CI:−0.09 to 0.86) showed no significant difference between SBT group and NSBT group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.