Claims

Analogical instruction had almost no effect on students' attitudes towards physics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After treatment, the analogical instruction showed no significant effect on the experimental group's attitudes towards physics (pre-post t = -1.93, p = 0.06). → Ugur et al. 2012

Evidence

Ugur et al. 2012

Gokhan Ugur, Refik Dilber, Yasemin Senpolat, Bahattin Duzgun. (2012). The Effects of Analogy on Students' Understanding of Direct Current Circuits and Attitudes towards Physics Lessons. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 211-223. http://www.akademikplus.com/eujer/index.html

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Attitude to Physics Scale (15 Likert-type items, reliability 0.83) given as pre-test to both groups and post-test to the experimental group only; pre-post means were 52.22 versus 55.18, t = -1.93, p = 0.06, a marginal non-significant result, with the instruction showing "no effects on the experimental group’s attitudes".

"After treatments, the analogical instruction has no effects on the experimental group’s attitudes towards phys- ics."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.