Claims

Analogical instruction produced significantly higher electric concept achievement than traditional instruction in 11th-grade physics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After treatment, the experimental (analogy) group showed better performance than the control group on the post Electric Concept Test, a statistically significant difference favoring the experimental group, with no pre-test difference between groups. → Ugur et al. 2012

Evidence

Ugur et al. 2012

Gokhan Ugur, Refik Dilber, Yasemin Senpolat, Bahattin Duzgun. (2012). The Effects of Analogy on Students' Understanding of Direct Current Circuits and Attitudes towards Physics Lessons. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 211-223. http://www.akademikplus.com/eujer/index.html

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent group t-test comparing post Electric Concept Test scores in a non-equivalent control group design with 51 students; the analogy group "showed better performance than control group’s students", a significant difference favoring the experimental group, while pre-test scores showed no statistical difference between groups.

"After treatment, experimental group’s students showed better performance than control group’s students. This su ccess ratio caused significant statist i- cal difference favor of experimental group (P<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.