Claims

Animation-supported 5E instruction produced significantly higher retention scores than the current programme five weeks after implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the retention test applied five weeks after the end of the implementation, the experimental group's scores were significantly higher than the control group's, indicating greater permanence of learning. → Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Evidence

Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Mehmet Fatih Özcan, Latife Kirbaşoğlu Kiliç. (2017). The Effects of Animation Supported 5E Model on Teaching 'Indicative and Subjunctive Moods' in 7th Grade Turkish Lesson. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051407

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Retention test applied to both groups five weeks after the post-test in the quasi-experimental study. The article reports the experimental group's retention scores were significantly higher, attributing greater permanence to the animation-supported 5E method; no test statistic or effect size is printed for this comparison.

"it was determined that the retention scores of the experimental group students were significantly higher than those of the control group students. In other words, the 5E method supported with animations used in the experimental group became more effective in ensuring the permanence of the information"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.