Anxiety about environmental issues was expressed by participants in both experiential groups but by no participants in the traditional-methods group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Anxiety expressions occurred in EG (2 participants, 8.3%) and CG1 (1 participant, 4.3%), with no anxiety data from CG2. → Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Evidence¶

Okur-Berberoglu 2017¶

Okur-Berberoglu, E. (2017). Outdoor experimental environmental education: An adult-centred intervention for the affective domain. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 34-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130600

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Content analysis of reflections in the case study. The article reports three participants mentioned anxiety about the future; one EG participant wrote "I have stomach pain" on the board before the first psychodrama activity.

"Both the experimental group (EG) and control group 1 (CG1) participants’ reflections contained data referring to the key affective domain concept of anxiety. CG2 participants had no data related to anxiety (Table 1)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Curiosity was stimulated by both outdoor and indoor experiential programmes but not by traditional teaching methods, with the outdoor programme more effective — related
• An outdoor experiential environmental education programme produced more affective-domain expressions among adult in-service teachers than indoor experiential or traditional programmes — a broader claim this one bears on
• Complaint expressions emerged only in the traditional-methods control group, attributed to intensive syllabi and unsupportive school management — related
• The affective concept of interest was observed only in the indoor experiential control group, not in the outdoor experimental group — related