Claims

The affective concept of interest was observed only in the indoor experiential control group, not in the outdoor experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interest expressions appeared only among CG1 participants (four expressions, 17.4%), with none in EG or CG2. → Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Evidence

Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Okur-Berberoglu, E. (2017). Outdoor experimental environmental education: An adult-centred intervention for the affective domain. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 34-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130600

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of participant reflections in the case study. Table 1 shows 4 CG1 expressions (17.4%) for interest; the article links these to the indoor stream ecology activity and one participant's personal interest in astrophysics.

"CG1 was the only group where the affective domain concept ‘interest’ was observed (Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.