Claims

An outdoor experiential environmental education programme produced more affective-domain expressions among adult in-service teachers than indoor experiential or traditional programmes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At the end of the research, the experimental outdoor group showed the most developed affective-domain concepts, CG1 intermediate, and CG2 the fewest. → Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Evidence

Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Okur-Berberoglu, E. (2017). Outdoor experimental environmental education: An adult-centred intervention for the affective domain. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 34-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130600

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative case study of 66 in-service teachers in Turkey: an outdoor experimental group (24 teachers), an indoor experiential control group (23), and a traditional-methods control group (19). The article reports "the most developed affective domain concepts were those of the experimental group".

"Data suggested that the most developed affective domain concepts were those of the experimental group (EG). Control group 1’s (CG1’s) affective domain concepts were more developed compared to the participants of CG2."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.