Claims

Complaint expressions emerged only in the traditional-methods control group, attributed to intensive syllabi and unsupportive school management

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two CG2 participants expressed complaint; no instances appeared in EG or CG1. → Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Evidence

Okur-Berberoglu 2017

Okur-Berberoglu, E. (2017). Outdoor experimental environmental education: An adult-centred intervention for the affective domain. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 34-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130600

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of reflections in the case study. CG2 complaints concerned an intensive syllabus leaving no time for environmental education and school principals not supporting environmental activities.

"Two participants from CG2, however, did submit reflections referring to the concept of complaint. There were no instances of this affective domain concept in either the EG or CG1 (Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.