Claims

The effect of drama on social studies achievement does not differ significantly by grade level (grades 4–7)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-group homogeneity testing showed no statistically significant difference in effect sizes across grade levels (QB=1.220 < X2=7.815; p=0.748), although descriptive effect sizes ranged from 0.951 (4th grade) to 1.265 (7th grade). → Yildirim 2022

Evidence

Yildirim 2022

Yildirim, E., Tikman, F., & Senturk, M. (2022). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of using the drama approach in social studies course. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 4(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.301

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Moderator analysis across 12 studies with 4th graders, 10 with 5th, 6 with 6th, and 10 with 7th graders. Descriptive effect sizes were 0.951, 1.134, 1.194, and 1.265 respectively, but the between-group test showed "no statistically significant difference between the groups".

"Since the value of homogeneity, which was QB=1.220, calculated in this study was smaller than the accepted critical value of 7.815 (QB=1.220.05), it could be assumed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.