AR/VR training shows equal or superior outcomes versus conventional training in dental and OMFS education¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most studies showed equal or superior outcomes of AR/VR versus conventional training, particularly in preparation accuracy, diagnostic precision, and learner confidence. → Maes M 2026
Evidence¶
Maes M 2026¶
Maes M, Van Gerven JD, Willaert R, Jacobs R. (2026). Augmented and virtual reality in dental and oral and maxillofacial surgery education: a systematic review with a taxonomy of training technologies. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08561-1
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Systematic review of 25 RCTs comparing AR/VR training with conventional methods; the review reports that "Most studies have shown equal or superior outcomes of AR/VR versus conventional training". No pooled effect size was computed.
"Most studies have shown equal or superior outcomes of AR/VR versus conventional training, particularly in terms of preparation accuracy, diagnostic precision, and learner confidence. A minority reported comparable results without clear advantages."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Immersive reality training produced higher knowledge and skill scores than conventional training in dental studies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Several included studies found haptic VR training equivalent rather than superior to conventional dental training — related
- Haptic virtual reality simulation reduces procedural time for pulpotomy training compared with conventional simulators — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- VR tools enhance acquisition and retention of clinical and procedural skills but face barriers including cybersickness, limited tactile feedback and variable long-term skill transfer — a broader claim this one bears on
- Virtual reality was particularly effective for procedural skill development and knowledge retention in paediatric undergraduate training — related
- Immersive VR-haptic and ITS modalities are more often associated with objective psychomotor and cognitive gains, while generative AI platforms are more often associated with affective outcomes — related
- Qualitative analysis found radiation became perceptible in VR for all participants, while all reported operability differences favoring conventional training — related
- Virtual haptic drilling training achieved outcomes similar to conventional practice in less time in restorative dentistry — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.