Claims

Haptic virtual reality simulation reduces procedural time for pulpotomy training compared with conventional simulators

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students using HVRS with SIMtoCARE dente for pulpotomy completed procedures faster (23.7 ± 1 min) than students using conventional simulators (25.9 ± 8.9 min). → Ruslin Muhammad 2026

Evidence

Ruslin Muhammad 2026

Ruslin Muhammad, Sjamsudin Endang, Hanafiah Olivia Avriyanti, Stevanie Carolina, Kurniawan Sri Hastuti, Anshar Muh, Boffano Paolo, Forouzanfar Tymour, Sukotjo Cortino. (2026). Exploring the impact of immersive reality for enhancing clinical training in dental education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09739-x

q2 · i? · review · r2

In the review's synthesis of procedural-time outcomes, Philip et al.'s pilot study is reported as showing "lower procedural time (23.7 ± 1 min) versus conventional simulators (25.9 ± 8.9 min)" in pediatric dentistry pulpotomy training. No effect size or test statistic is printed.

"Philip et al. found students using HVRS with SIMtoCARE dente® for pulpotomy had lower procedural time (23.7 ± 1 min) versus conventional simulators (25.9 ± 8.9 min) [35]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.