Claims

The science club–science GPA relationship is not significant for Asian students, though the math club relationship is

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? For Asian students, math club participation relates to higher math GPAs, but science club participation shows no statistically significant relationship with science GPA. → Gottfried 2013

Evidence

Gottfried 2013

Gottfried, M. A. & Williams, D. (2013). STEM Club Participation and STEM Schooling Outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21 (79). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1361

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Subgroup models in Tables 5 and 6: Asian students showed significant math club coefficients (e.g., 0.314** full OLS) but non-significant science club coefficients (e.g., 0.116 full OLS; 0.021 block matching). The authors attribute possible instability to small subgroup sample sizes.

"However, for science club participation, there was no longer a statistically significant relationship for Asian students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id asian-students-science-club-null-math-significant
title The science club–science GPA relationship is not significant for Asian students, though the math club relationship is
description The science club–science GPA relationship is not significant for Asian students, though the math club relationship is
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gottfried-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.